|
|
Post by joekido on Dec 10, 2012 19:54:50 GMT -5
Will be updated later
|
|
|
|
Post by gbird on Dec 11, 2012 9:45:00 GMT -5
Once again H50 was listed in the winners section.
Next on the Eye net were two original episodes of 2 Broke Girls (9 p.m. #1: 7.5/11; 9:30 p.m.: #1, 7.2/11), which dipped by 19 percent, on average, from the year-ago combination of Two and a Half Men (9.9/15 on 12/12/11) and Mike & Molly (8.3/14). And three year-old Hawaii Five-O capped off the evening with a dominant 6.8/11 at 10 p.m., which was just seven percent below the 7.3/12 one year earlier.
|
|
|
|
Post by joekido on Dec 11, 2012 9:57:18 GMT -5
Not sure if it's suppose to be higher of lower but it's in a winner section, that can mean it's higher
|
|
|
|
Post by biochemgeek on Dec 11, 2012 11:49:33 GMT -5
Woohoo! Wish all these viewers could have been treated to a stronger episode.
CBS Hawaii Five -0, demo = 2.7/7, total = 10.383
NBC Michael Buble: Home for the Holidays, demo = 1.4/4, total = 5.752
ABC Castle - R, demo = 1.3/3, total = 5.928
This is the disclaimer on the site.
Last night’s Monday Night Football game (Patriots/Texans) was simulcast on the CBS affiliate in Houston and the ABC affiliate in Boston. As a result, the NBC and ABC numbers may be inflated and subject to more than typical adjustments in the finals.
Do they really mean NBC's numbers may be inflated, if the football was on CBS?
|
|
|
|
Post by sunnyirish08 on Dec 11, 2012 16:40:53 GMT -5
*does a happy dance* yay!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by hawaiifive02012 on Dec 11, 2012 17:23:42 GMT -5
Final numbers:
CBS Hawaii Five -0, demo = 2.5/6, total = 9.84
NBC Michael Buble: Home for the Holidays, demo = 1.4/4, total = 5.66
ABC Castle - R, demo = 1.1/3, total = 5.09
|
|
|
|
Post by joekido on Dec 11, 2012 18:41:00 GMT -5
Great job guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by darksea on Dec 11, 2012 22:01:55 GMT -5
Woohoo! Wish all these viewers could have been treated to a stronger episode. CBS Hawaii Five -0, demo = 2.7/7, total = 10.383 NBC Michael Buble: Home for the Holidays, demo = 1.4/4, total = 5.752 ABC Castle - R, demo = 1.3/3, total = 5.928 This is the disclaimer on the site. Last night’s Monday Night Football game (Patriots/Texans) was simulcast on the CBS affiliate in Houston and the ABC affiliate in Boston. As a result, the NBC and ABC numbers may be inflated and subject to more than typical adjustments in the finals.Do they really mean NBC's numbers may be inflated, if the football was on CBS? What it means is that NBC and ABC's numbers in the Houston and Boston markets were going to be higher in numbers for the existing programs, because Hawaii Five O wasn't on in those two markets. The ratings could have been higher if they had shown in those two markets, but they were pre-empted because of the football game. |
|
|
|
Post by biochemgeek on Dec 11, 2012 23:26:10 GMT -5
I always thought it meant that the football viewing numbers were included in the preliminary broadcast numbers for the TV episode broadcast nationally (thus inflating those numbers). Then in the finals we see the drop caused by removing the football-related numbers. Have I been totally wrong all this time, or is this particular instance a different case? At first glance I thought they'd made a typo and said NBC, when they meant CBS.
|
|
|
|
Post by darksea on Dec 12, 2012 0:13:10 GMT -5
As far as I have been educated in the wonderful Nielsen rating system, I think you have been a little off.
See, the football numbers count towards the football game, not the episode. For example, when Hurricane Sandy was ongoing, and CBS replaced their programming with reruns and a Sandy special, the ratings for ABC and NBC were seen as 'inflated' because the normal competition wasn't available, even on a national basis.
The ABC program running at the time was a Rerun of Castle, so when it was pre-empted in Boston, it would have barely counted anyway. But those turning off from the game would have registered differently on the nielsen count, and would have inflated other affiliate numbers. Basically they are saying that the numbers are missing major markets, and will be minimally counted because one major market was missing, and threw the balance off slightly.
Or at least that is what the Nielsen site had to say about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by gbird on Dec 12, 2012 3:50:40 GMT -5
Thanks for the updated figures . Happy to seem them getting better figures .  |
|
|
|
Post by biochemgeek on Dec 12, 2012 8:28:11 GMT -5
Thanks for the explanation, darksea.
|
|
Sept 22, 2013 7:25:03 GMT -5
Sept 22, 2013 7:25:03 GMT -5
